I chose the following sites based primarily on user-friendly organization.Usability, social aspects, and content quality also were my considerations. Here is my list:
http://magic.pen.fizzlebot.com/
http://del.icio.us/
http://www.snapfish.com/
http://earth.google.com/
http://www.myspace.com/
http://www.lulu.com/
http://www.docstoc.com/
http://www.myheritage.com/
http://pbwiki.com/
http://istats.com.au/
http://farecast.live.com/
http://www.kayak.com/
According to http://www.seomoz.org/ the web sites on the award list are all nominated according to several categories ( content, leveraging of popular trends, inclusion of emerging web technologies) To win the awards, they must be voted on by the best bloggers and business people.
Also, http://knowledge.computing.co.uk/2008/05/new-web-20-awar.html is an interesting site to read to find out what is happening in the UK about the Web 2.0 awards.
As I was reading blogs about the Web2.0 awards, I stumbled across http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/2008/06/12/web-20-awards/ Evidently, these awards were dropped from Google Results. Many bloggers had their own opinions why this has happened.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hi, its Dave here from seoco.co.uk, thankyou for linking to my blog. Erm is there any chance you could fix the link? It does not work properly at the moment I think there is a word at the end of it or something.
The awards page is back in Google now. It dropped from the results because the web-page url ended in a .0. Jane blogged about it here:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/unwritten-google-webmaster-guideline-dont-end-urls-in-0
Best Regards
Dave
Thanks for writing. I have made the necessary edit to your site.
Post a Comment